<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Social Media Monitoring and measurement &#187; social media measurement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/tag/social-media-measurement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog</link>
	<description>Social Media Monitoring and measurement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:18:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Getting the measure of social media</title>
		<link>http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/2011/03/31/getting-the-measure-of-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/2011/03/31/getting-the-measure-of-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dionne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barcelona Principles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chartered Institute for Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rentokil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media measurement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/?p=1696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Social media can and should be measured.  That was one of the key Barcelona Principles established a group of industry experts in partnership with the Association for Measurement and Evaluation of Communication (AMEC). The principles were set up to underpin measurement and evaluation and received industry-wide consensus.
The Chartered Institute of Public Relations (CIPR), one of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social media can and should be measured.  That was one of the key Barcelona Principles established a group of industry experts in partnership with the Association for Measurement and Evaluation of Communication (AMEC). The principles were set up to underpin measurement and evaluation and received industry-wide consensus.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.cipr.co.uk/content/policy-resources/for-practitioners/research-planning-and-measurement/toolkit/measuring-social-media">Chartered Institute of Public Relations </a>(CIPR), one of AMEC’s Barcelona partners, has written a set of excellent guidelines for measuring social media.</p>
<p>CIPR CEO <a href="http://www.prweek.com/uk/channel/CityandCorporate/article/1062956/cipr-launches-social-media-guidance-ahead-2011-conference/">Jane Wilson</a> explains on PR Week that “<em>measurement should not just be about tracking, or trying to understand how influential any particular commentator or participant is. It is about identifying what conversations the organisation should participate in and understanding how engagement can help an organisation meet its objectives</em>”.</p>
<p>One of the CIPR’s key assertions is organisations need to build on tracking the social space to identify the conversations to participate or start up.  Metrics should be analysed to gauge the impact engagement has on business goals, which it defines as ‘outcomes’.  Social buzz should be tracked and analysed as they can also be outputs of communications strategies and impact reputation.</p>
<p>From a brand perspective, monitoring and measuring social media is key to our clients who use social platforms to stay engaged with their audience.  As we mention in our recent post, the upshot of sustained engagement for <a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/2011/03/28/rentokil-goes-the-extra-mile-where-many-ftse100s-fear-to-tread/">Rentokil</a> has been a 146% rise in enquiries to deal with problem nests as a result of its Ukwaspwatch.co.uk social campaign.   Proactive consumer engagement through social media has had a measurable &amp; positive impact on their business.</p>
<p>Do you know what the outcomes of your social campaigns have been?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/2011/03/31/getting-the-measure-of-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh brother …</title>
		<link>http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/2010/06/16/oh-brother-%e2%80%a6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/2010/06/16/oh-brother-%e2%80%a6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dionne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BB11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endemol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media measurement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/?p=204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roll up. Roll up.
Roll up for the circus was the clarion call of Big Brother (BB) producers Endemol as the final series of BB kicked off last Wednesday.  Thirteen housemates and a &#8216;mole&#8217; entered the house and we were off.  Shabby, Caoimhe, Ife, Corin, Rachael, Sunshine, Louise, Steve, John-James, Ben, Nathan, Govan, Dave &#38; Mario [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roll up. Roll up.</p>
<p>Roll up for the circus was the clarion call of <strong>Big Brother</strong> (BB) producers Endemol as the final series of BB kicked off last Wednesday.  Thirteen housemates and a &#8216;mole&#8217; entered the house and we were off.  Shabby, Caoimhe, Ife, Corin, Rachael, Sunshine, Louise, Steve, John-James, Ben, Nathan, Govan, Dave &amp; Mario the mole were in.</p>
<p>So, we joined the <strong>conversation</strong> around the online watercooler to bring you a <strong>360-analysis</strong> of all the goings on in the house, the nominations &amp; evictions, the twists &amp; turns, who&#8217;s saying what, why and where.</p>
<p>Over the first few days all the housemates began to &#8216;bond&#8217;.  All was quiet in the state of Endemol.</p>
<p>But, all circuses have a ringmaster and Big Brother set wild-card hopeful Mario, now called Moley, a secret, &#8216;impossible&#8217;, task to sabotage the house until Saturday.  He wasn&#8217;t &#8216;officially&#8217; rumbled by the others and was allowed to stay as a bona-fide housemate – with all the usual trappings: rows, conspiracies and a love interest.</p>
<p>So,<strong> where </strong>was everyone talking about BB?  A quick look at the <strong>channel breakdown </strong>showed all the noise was on<strong> Twitter </strong>with a 73.8 per cent share of voice.  In terms of<strong> authority</strong>, our <strong>social media measurement</strong> system scored<strong> Yahoo! Answers</strong> highest with a 62.6 per cent share of voice.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/BB-channel-21.png"><img class="size-large wp-image-206  alignleft" src="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/BB-channel-21-1023x287.png" alt="" width="649" height="172" /></a></p>
<p>Figure 1: Channel breakdown for the Big Brother discussion – 9/6 to 15/6</p>
<p><strong>Who </strong>was everyone talking about?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Girls-buzz-volumes.png"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-207" src="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Girls-buzz-volumes-1024x324.png" alt="" width="647" height="285" /></a></p>
<p>Figure 2: Girls buzz volume – 9/6 to 15/6</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Boys-buzz-volumes-2.png"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-208" src="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Boys-buzz-volumes-2-1024x324.png" alt="" width="648" height="295" /></a></p>
<p>Figure 3: Boys buzz volume – 9/6 to 15/6</p>
<p>The <strong>buzz </strong>was around <strong>Sunshine</strong> and<strong> Mario </strong>over the course of the first week.  We also ran a snapshot of the Big Brother discussion in <strong>online news</strong> and<strong> social media</strong> for the <strong>hot topics</strong>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/BB-topic-cloud2.png"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-236" src="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/BB-topic-cloud2-1024x183.png" alt="" width="657" height="159" /></a></p>
<p>Figure 4: Topic cloud for the Big Brother conversation – 9/6 to 15/6</p>
<p>The <strong>stand-out topic </strong>was John-James, the bookies early favourite to win. The <strong>tweet</strong> below gave us a bit of clue about his early popularity.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/twitter-quote.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-210" src="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/twitter-quote-300x205.png" alt="" width="320" height="218" /></a></p>
<p>Fast forward to Monday – <strong>nominations</strong> day.  The annual love-in between all the housemates came to its traditional early end.  Six days was a long time in reality TV and the honeymoon period was well and truly over.  The first row erupted between Dave and Govan &#8211; over some onions.  A right old ding dong followed.</p>
<p>On Tuesday, there was a nominations twist which created another buzz in the tweetstream.  First off, <strong>Shabby</strong>, <strong>Sunshine</strong> &amp; <strong>Dave </strong>were put up for eviction by the house.  But, Dave beat the other two in a challenge, saved himself, and put <strong>Rachael</strong> up instead.  Shabby was agitated about her nomination and had a bust-up with Ben.</p>
<p>Who&#8217;s likely to go?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Sentiment-nominations-21.png"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-274" src="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Sentiment-nominations-21-1024x324.png" alt="" width="618" height="229" /></a></p>
<p>Figure 5: Sentiment for nominated housemates &#8211; 15/6</p>
<p>Yesterday, <strong>Sunshine</strong> was the most talked about.  She also had the <strong>highest</strong> number of<strong> negative </strong>mentions &#8211; mainly calls to get her out.  But, there were also reports that she was being bullied by the other housemates. (<a href="http://www.dailystar.co.uk/bigbrother/view/139905/Big-Brother-11-The-bullies-are-back/">Daily Star </a>15/6)</p>
<p>Shabby was the bookie&#8217;s favourite to go at 8/15.  But, where we&#8217;re predicting Rachael.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/2010/06/16/oh-brother-%e2%80%a6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Planes, seats and tweets</title>
		<link>http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/2010/06/03/planes-seats-and-tweets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/2010/06/03/planes-seats-and-tweets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 11:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dionne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Airways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custom reporting tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentiment analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unite]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a week when co-operation and partnership were the buzz words in Westminster, the stand-off between BA and Unite showed no signs of cooling.  11th-hour talks to stop a five-day strike, due to start 24 May, collapsed over the weekend and the strike went ahead.  Both sides were in deadlock.
It was also the week when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a week when co-operation and partnership were the buzz words in Westminster, the stand-off between BA and Unite showed no signs of cooling.  11th-hour talks to stop a five-day strike, due to start 24 May, collapsed over the weekend and the strike went ahead.  Both sides were in deadlock.</p>
<p>It was also the week when Twitter joined the fray.  The airline’s boss Willie Walsh criticised Unite joint leader Derek Simpson for tweeting live details of Saturday’s talks.  The row added to a wider debate on using the micro-blog in official meetings, and elsewhere, Coalition ministers have already been told to leave their BlackBerrys at the Cabinet office door.</p>
<p>So what’s happening?  And, what’s the real impact of the strike?  A bit of social media monitoring using Sentiment Metric’s system helped us to make sense of, and measure, the impact the strike was having on BA, Unite, and the airline’s passengers.  We looked at online news and social media.</p>
<p>We were able to look at <strong>buzz levels</strong> around the dispute,<strong> influencial sources</strong> in the discussion,<strong> what everyone was talking about</strong> and also look at whether comment on the strike was<strong> positive</strong>, <strong>neutral</strong> or<strong> negative</strong>.  We also added a human touch to our research to interpret and assess the valuable information generated by our system. </p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/buzz-volume7.png"></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/buzz-volume1.png"></a><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/buzz-volume1.png"></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/buzz-volume8.png"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-100" src="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/buzz-volume8-1024x240.png" alt="" width="628" height="245" /></a></p>
<p>Figure 1: Buzz volumes for the strike &#8211; 20/5 to 26/5</p>
<p>We <strong>monitored</strong> thousands of mentions, in <strong>real-time</strong>, across the BA discussion, and tailored our research to mentions of BA, Unite and the strike.  One of the first things we noticed was a spike in coverage on 23 May when <strong>buzz volumes</strong> peaked at 579 across all channels.</p>
<p>Our industry-leading <strong>custom reporting tool</strong> generated the top 75 <strong>lead topics</strong> for the strike over the reporting period.  It showed that the Unite union’s negotiations with BA to settle the dispute dominated coverage.  On 20 May, the High Court over-ruled an injunction that had stopped the planned walk-out by cabin crew.</p>
<p>And, the great thing about our system is we can track people, products, services, industry terms and over <strong>300 types</strong> of other <strong>entities</strong>.  We are not limited to single word phrasing in the topic cloud.  So, as you can see in the chart below, we picked up topics such as ‘industrial dispute mediator’ and ‘High Court’ in the lead topics.</p>
<p>Interestingly, there wasn’t a mention of passengers in the lead topics but the effect of industrial action on the airline’s passengers was discussed.  Some <strong>human analysis</strong> across our system showed a focus on the disruption many passengers faced as the strike went ahead. (<a href="http://www.politics.co.uk/news/transport/-catastrophic-breakdown-in-ba-strike-talks-$21378212.htm">politics.co.uk </a>23/5)</p>
<h2><a href="http://www.politics.co.uk/news/transport/-catastrophic-breakdown-in-ba-strike-talks-$21378212.htm"></a> </h2>
<p><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Cropped-topic-cloud-BA-Unite-strike.png"></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Cropped-topic-cloud-BA-Unite-strike2.png"></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Cropped-topic-cloud-BA-Unite-strike3.png"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-101" src="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Cropped-topic-cloud-BA-Unite-strike3-1024x151.png" alt="" width="634" height="173" /></a></p>
<p>Figure 2: Topic cloud for the strike – 20/5 to 26/5</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Cropped-topic-cloud-BA-Unite-strike-Twitter3.png"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-102" src="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Cropped-topic-cloud-BA-Unite-strike-Twitter3-1024x78.png" alt="" width="626" height="53" /></a></p>
<p>Figure 3: Topic cloud for the strike on Twitter – 20/5 to 26/5</p>
<p>The <strong>custom reporting tool</strong> also enabled us to analyse the<strong> lead topics</strong> on<strong> any day</strong>, on<strong> any channel</strong>.  Two phrases on Twitter jumped out: the reference to a web campaign heating up and a &#8216;brutal web war&#8217;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Twitter-quote.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-64" src="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Twitter-quote-300x179.png" alt="" width="205" height="145" /></a></p>
<p>So,<strong> who</strong> was driving the discussion?</p>
<p>There was certainly a lot of noise on Twitter, which led the pack in terms of mentions with 49.8 per cent share of voice.  This was among the<strong> top ten influencial sources</strong>.  In terms of authority, our social media measurement system scored BBC News as highest with a 19.4 per cent share of voice.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Influencers-BA-Unite-+-strike1.png"></a><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Influencers-BA-Unite-+-strike2.png"></a><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Influencers-BA-Unite-+-strike.png"></a></p>
<p> <a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Influencers-BA-Unite-+-strike6.png"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-107" src="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Influencers-BA-Unite-+-strike6-1024x267.png" alt="" width="637" height="185" /></a><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Influencers-BA-Unite-+-strike5.png"></a><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Influencers-BA-Unite-+-strike4.png"></a></p>
<p>Figure 4: Top influencial sources for the strike – by mentions &#8211; 20/5 to 26/5</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Sentiment-BA-Unite-+-strike.png"></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Sentiment-BA-Unite-+-strike1.png"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-105" src="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Sentiment-BA-Unite-+-strike1-1024x240.png" alt="" width="493" height="221" /></a></p>
<p>Figure 5: Sentiment for the strike – 20/5 to 26/5</p>
<p>Over the reporting period, our system analysed over 1500 mentions of BA, Unite and the strike for sentiment.  The results across all channels were:</p>
<p>27.8 per cent of mentions were scored as positive<br />
53.4 per cent of mentions were scored as neutral<br />
18.8 per cent of mentions were scored as negative</p>
<p>There was <strong>positive</strong> sentiment to news that Unite won its appeal against a High-Court injunction on Thursday. (<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8694850.stm">BBC News </a>20/5)</p>
<p>BA attracted <strong>positive</strong> sentiment on news that it had successfully run 65 per cent of 65 per cent of flights in May. (<a href="http://www.gather.com/">gather.com </a>23/5)</p>
<p>But, there was a<strong> negative</strong> tone to comments on BA’s balance sheet and there were many referencing to the fact that BA was a loss-making airline. For example, <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-british-airways-strike-20100525-8,0,5339503.story?track=rss">LA Times </a>(25/5) </p>
<p>A passenger post on Digital spy talked of the &#8216;buffoons&#8217; at Unite taking at action at the &#8216;world’s worse&#8217; airport – Heathrow. (<a href="http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=1262774&amp;page=18%23post40405407">Digital Spy</a> 21/5)</p>
<p>We also noticed a spike in<strong> negative </strong>mentions on 23 May and we found that these were driven by syndicated comments from Unite joint general secretary Tony Woodley.  The union leader said there had been a &#8220;<em>catastrophic breakdown&#8221;</em> in relations as the deadline for the first strike neared.</p>
<p>Using the<strong> custom reporting tool</strong>, we could also <strong>drill down</strong> and look at sentiment on individual channels such as <strong>Twitter</strong>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Sentiment-BA-Unite-+-strike-Twitter.png"></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Sentiment-BA-Unite-+-strike-Twitter1.png"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-104" src="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Sentiment-BA-Unite-+-strike-Twitter1-1024x240.png" alt="" width="515" height="247" /></a></p>
<p>Figure 5: Sentiment for the strike on Twitter – 20/5 to 26/5</p>
<p>The spike in<strong> positive</strong> sentiment on 20 May was driven by chatter on Unite’s High Court victory.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Twitter-quote-32.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-80" src="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Twitter-quote-32-300x126.png" alt="" width="197" height="136" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Twitter-quote-2.png"></a></p>
<p>The spike in <strong>negative</strong> coverage on 23 May was driven by chatter about the protestors that stormed the talks.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Twitter-quote-22.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-84" src="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Twitter-quote-22-300x136.png" alt="" width="200" height="116" /></a><br />
 </p>
<p>Talks on 26 May to end the next wave of strikes on 30 May were postponed until Friday. It is difficult to predict the final outcome of this bitter dispute. The question is will either side be declared a winner in the end?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/2010/06/03/planes-seats-and-tweets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sentiment Metrics Updates 22nd April</title>
		<link>http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/2009/04/22/sentiment-metrics-updates-22nd-april/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/2009/04/22/sentiment-metrics-updates-22nd-april/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leon Chaddock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[System Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senitment Metrics Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media monitoring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/2009/04/22/sentiment-metrics-updates-22nd-april/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a summary of the latest updates to our system.
Search term configuration screen
We have completely overhauled the search term config screen. Previously you could only do a single AND , NOT or OR. You can now do as many as you like!
You can choose for all reports to only contain social media, only online [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Here is a summary of the latest updates to our system.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial"><font size="2" face="Arial"><strong>Search term configuration screen</strong></font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial">We have completely overhauled the search term config screen. Previously you could only do a single AND , NOT or OR. You can now do as many as you like!</font></p>
<p>You can choose for all reports to only contain social media, only online news, or both.</p>
<p>You can choose for all reports to only show content from a certain region/ country.</p>
<p>On entering a search term we will now straight away show 30 days history of the search term aswell as collecting realtime updates. </p>
<p>This is in addition to archiving as your campaign progresses we will always keep upto 2 years of data.</p>
<p></font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial"><strong>Expanded Twitter Coverage</strong></font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial">Previously we picked up a good deal of Tweets from Twitter, but it wasn&#8217;t exhaustive. We now have full Twitter coverage. We have added a new &#8220;Micro-blog&#8221; category to the channel reports.</font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial"><strong> Admin screen changes</strong></p>
<p>Agencies with multi user accounts, can now choose how many search terms their clients should be able to add to the system. This is in addition to the usual facility of being able to share search terms and profiles to selected user accounts.</p>
<p>There is also an add url function, so you may add new blogs to our index.</p>
<p><strong>Partners / White label systems</strong></p>
<p>All of the new features have been rolled out to your installations today, as always we welcome any feedback or feature requests. </p>
<p><strong>Coming next</strong></p>
<p>We are incorporating blog comments into the reports. Also adding a blog comment channel in the channel reports. We are developing an API, and also adding some more enhancements to our Top Topics report.</p>
<p></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/2009/04/22/sentiment-metrics-updates-22nd-april/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SentimentMetrics Version 2 live!</title>
		<link>http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/2008/12/04/sentimentmetrics-version-2-live/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/2008/12/04/sentimentmetrics-version-2-live/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leon Chaddock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New user interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media monitoring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/2008/12/04/sentimentmetrics-version-2-live/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am pleased to announce version 2 of our user interface is now live! As a data focused company most of the work we do goes on under the hood, things that our users don&#8217;t ever get to see. As such we hadnâ€™t spent quite enough of our resources shining the user interface, making it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Georgia">I am pleased to announce version 2 of our user interface is now live!<o:p></o:p></span><span style="font-family: Georgia"> </span><span style="font-family: Georgia">As a data focused company most of the work we do goes on under the hood, things that our users don&#8217;t ever get to see. As such we hadnâ€™t spent quite enough of our resources shining the user interface, making it user friendly and to be honest it lacked a certain WOW factor. Which lets face it in this modern â€œAppleâ€ age appearance goes a long way!</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Georgia"><o:p></o:p></span><span style="font-family: Georgia">You can see a screenshot of the new look and feel here, but I promise its even better when you use it live, why not contact us for a demo or trial :<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="line-height: 15.6pt"><span style="font-family: Georgia"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/v2.gif" title="Version 2">http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/v2.gif</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sentimentmetrics.com/blog/2008/12/04/sentimentmetrics-version-2-live/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

